- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
This is saying that if a small minority wants something changed we should change it, But I disagree, because say there is a family of five and four of the people want a swimming pool, but one, the smallest brother, wants to not have a pool, how would you react? Go with the majority of the family, or side with the Smallest brother? This is kind of the situation, because even if the brother doesn't get his way, he can opt out of going in the pool.
Mrs. Welch says that This is a form of "Legalized Racism" but this whole thing isn't really a matter of racism. As Dictonary.com states it is, "A belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others." This definitely isn't a situation where one race thinks they are better than the other.
Mr. Wollin is saying that we should change huge name mascots to other things just because a small group of people find them offensive, but I disagree, because if everyone in the world had their way the whole world would be in chaos, people would be fighting with everyone.
By the way Trade_Mark is Timothy Mancheski
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!